What exactly are postmodern neo-Marxists

On the immateriality of postmodernism or: What else does dialectical materialism have to say? Preliminary considerations for historical-critical reflection on a circulating theory

Literature

  1. 1

    Cf. Arnold Gehlen, “About cultural crystallization”, in: Studies in anthropology and sociology, Neuwied, Berlin 1963, 311-313. Wolfgang Welsch tried to differentiate between postmodernism and posthistoire, a columnist postmodern of doom, namely Baudrillard, from a serious postmodern for whom human history is not yet over. I doubt whether this differentiation can be maintained; the cultural and political practice of the coming years will provide information on this

    Google Scholar

  2. 1a

    Wolfgang Welsch, Our postmodern modernity, Weinheim 1987, 17-23, 152).

    Google Scholar

  3. 3

    See Christoph Schorsch, “Thinking in a Crisis”, great philosophia 3/1 (1990), 97-111, here: 100.

    Google Scholar

  4. 4

    See Stefan Breuer, Aspects of total socialization, Freiburg 1985, 68-72.

    Google Scholar

  5. 6

    See Karl Marx, Wages, prices and profits, Berlin 1928, 38.

    Google Scholar

  6. 8

    Karl Marx, The capital, 3 vol., Berlin 1947, 1, 634.

    Google Scholar

  7. 9

    Ernest Mandel, Late capitalism, 3rd edition, Frankfurt a.M. 1974, 44.

    Google Scholar

  8. 11

    See Karl Marx, Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough draft), Berlin 1974, 15. On the one hand, the commodity must always prove itself as use value before it can be realized as value. On the other hand, in order to be able to realize itself as use value, it must always appear as exchange value. What if the exchange-value character of the commodities is already in their use-value structure?

    Google Scholar

  9. 12

    Cf. Klaus R. Scherpe, “Dramatization and Entdramatization of Downfall”, in: Andreas Huyssen, Klaus Scherpe (Ed.), Postmodern. Signs of cultural change, Hamburg 1986, 290.

    Google Scholar

  10. 14

    See Jean Baudrillard, The symbolic exchange and death, Munich 1982, 26.

    Google Scholar

  11. 18

    See Herbert Marcuse, The one-dimensional human, Neuwied and Berlin 1967, 226.

    Google Scholar

  12. 24

    Cf. Fredric Jameson, “On the logic of culture in late capitalism”, in: Andreas Huyssen, Klaus Scherpe (ed.), Postmodern. Signs of cultural change, Hamburg 1986, 45-102, here: 80.

    Google Scholar

  13. 26

    See Manfred Frank, The infinite lack of being. Schelling's criticism of Hegel and the beginnings of Marx's dialectic, Frankfurt a.M. 1975, 197.

    Google Scholar

  14. 27

    This is how Jean Baudrillard argues, for example. Not the individual commodity is raised to the rank of a fetish, not even money, but the capitalist economic system as a whole (Jean Baudrillard, “Fetischismus und Ideologie: Die semiologi-sche reduction”, in: Pontalis [ed. Objects of fetishism, Frankfurt a.M. 1972.).

    Google Scholar

  15. 28

    See Mandel (note 9) and Andre Gorz, Farewell to the proletariat, Frankfurt a.M. 1980.

    Google Scholar

  16. 34

    Hans-Jürgen Krahl, Constitution and class struggle. Writings and speeches 1966–1970, 4th edition, Frankfurt a.M. 1971, 81 (she).

    Google Scholar

  17. 35

    See Karl Marx, On the criticism of political economy, Berlin 1972, 29.

  18. 42

    Friedrich Schlegel, Philosophical Lectures. Critical Friedrich Schlegel Edition, ed. Ernst Behler, Munich, Paderborn, Vienna 1958, XII, 42.

    Google Scholar

  19. 47

    Alfred Schmidt, The concept of nature in the teaching of Marx, 2nd edition, Frankfurt a.M., Cologne 1974, 81.

    Google Scholar

  20. 53

    Cf. Niklas Luhmann, “Intersubjectivity or Communication. Different starting points for sociological theory formation ”, Archivio di Filosofia LIV / 1-3 (1986) 46.

    Google Scholar

  21. 67

    See on this connection: Petra Roder, “Poeta faber. The early romantic poiesis thought and the idea of ​​free, conscious activity ’in Karl Marx”, DVjs 63/3 (1989): 522-546. "The human being is selfish Each of his essential forces has in him the quality of Selfishness. " (Marx [note 51], 575, Herv. v. Marx) Manfred Frank has convincingly demonstrated that this construction does not represent a naturalistic reduction, but rather a productive self-relationship as a relationship to the totality of reality shaped by human activities (Frank [note 26], 226).

    Article Google Scholar

  22. 75

    See Henri Lefebvre, Metaphilosophy. Prolegomena, Frankfurt / M. 1975, 359.

    Google Scholar

  23. 78

    Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “The Concept of Nature”, in: Manfred Frank, Gerhard Kurz (Eds.), Materials on Schelling's philosophical beginnings, Frankfurt / M. 1975, 280-291, here: 283.

    Google Scholar

  24. 86

    Martin Seel, The art of division, Frankfurt / M. 1985, 331.

    Google Scholar

  25. 87

    Cf. Gernot Böhme, For an ecological natural aesthetic, Frankfurt / M. 1989, 9.

    Google Scholar

  26. 88

    Marx (note 51), 516-517 (edited by von Marx); see Peter Bulthaup, “The Confusion of Lower Sophia”, in: Walter Bänsch (Ed.), To the modernity of romance, Stuttgart 1977, 99.

    Google Scholar

  27. 89

    See Alfred Schmidt, Emancipatory sensuality. Ludwig Feuerbach's anthropological materialism, Stuttgart 1973, 122.

    Google Scholar

  28. 105

    Theodor W. Adorno, On the metacritic of epistemology, Stuttgart 1956, 193.

    Google Scholar

  29. 116

    Hartmut Böhme, previously unpublished manuscript on “Prospects of an Aesthetic Theory of Nature” will appear soon in: Jörg Huber (Ed.), Perception of the present, Frankfurt / M. 1992, 4.

    Google Scholar

  30. 122

    Jean-François Lyotard, Essays on an Affirmative Aesthetic, Berlin 1982, 21 (Herv. V. Lyotard).

    Google Scholar

  31. 130

    See Jean-François Lyotard, The postmodern knowledge, Vienna 1986, 132.

    Google Scholar

  32. 131

    Jean Baudrillard, “Video world and fractal subject”, in: Karlheinz Barck et al., Aesthesis. Perception today or perspectives from a different aesthetic, Leipzig 1990, 252.

    Google Scholar

  33. 133

    See Jean Baudrillard, The symbolic exchange and death, Munich 1982, 15.

    Google Scholar

  34. 145

    Jean-François Lyotard, Apathy in theory, Berlin 1979, 65.

    Google Scholar

  35. 148

    Jean-François Lyotard, Forays. Law, form, event, Vienna 1989, 114–116: It is neither possible nor necessary to experience capitalism as deficient, as it is well on its way to ensuring a fair distribution of surplus value, which Marx could only imagine beyond bourgeois society.

    Google Scholar

  36. 151

    Jean-François Lyotard (and others), Immateriality and postmodernism, Berlin 1985, 25.

    Google Scholar

  37. 181

    Peter Bulthaup, “The Confusion of Lower Sophia”, in: Dieter Bänsch (Ed.), Literature and social science 8. On the modernity of romanticism, Stuttgart 1977, 87-109, here: 97.

    Google Scholar

  38. 183

    See Bernd Taureck, French philosophy in the 20th century, Hamburg 1988, 153-160.

    Google Scholar

  39. 203

    Karl Marx, The early writings, ed. Siegfried Landshut, Stuttgart 1971, 216.

  40. 204

    See Herbert Marcuse, The permanence of art, Munich, Vienna 1977.

    Google Scholar

  41. 209

    Jürgen Ritsert, Claus Roishausen, The Conservatism of Critical Theory, Frankfurt a.M. 1971, 78.

    Google Scholar

  42. 211

    Cf. Gernot Böhme: “At the end of the Bacon age”, Frankfurter Rundschau from August 10, 1991, 16.

    Google Scholar

  43. 218

    Joachim Israel, The term alienation, Hamburg 1972, 311

    Google Scholar

  44. 218a

    quoted by J. W. N. Watkins, “Methodological Individualism and Social Tendencies”, in: M. Brodbeck (Ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, New York 1968, 271.

    Google Scholar

  45. 224

    See Manfred Frank, The sayable and the unspeakable. Studies on the latest French hermeneutics and text theory, Frankfurt a.M. 1980, 106.

    Google Scholar

  46. 230

    Ygi Albrecht Wellmer, On the dialectic of modernity and postmodernism, Frankfurt a.M. 1985, 105.

    Google Scholar

  47. 238

    Jürgen Habermas, Technology and science as ‘ideology’, 4th edition, Frankfurt / M. 1970, 58.

    Google Scholar

  48. 244

    Christoph Schorsch, “Thinking in a Crisis”, in: great philosophic 3/1 (1990), 100.

    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Hamburg, Germany

    Petra Röder

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Röder.

About this article

Cite this article

Röder, P. On the immateriality of postmodernism or: What else does dialectical materialism have to say? Preliminary considerations for historical-critical reflection on a circulating theory. Dtsch Vierteljahrsschr Literaturwiss Geistesgesch67, 322-387 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396211

Download citation