Who pays for privacy
Data protectionists warn: Those who pay cashlessly are selling privacy
Cash is becoming less important, and more and more payments are being processed digitally. Experts fear that this will lead to “transparent people”.
Paying contactless with credit card or payment apps is easy and convenient. And it's getting more and more popular. A number of banks and financial service providers are now vying for the favor of Swiss customers with different systems. This is likely to further strengthen the trend towards increasingly foregoing cash in daily use. Today around 60 percent of all transactions in this country are processed with cash. 25 years ago it was a good 90 percent.
But it is not just consumer behavior that causes cash to lose its importance. In an interview with the “Tages-Anzeiger”, Hanspeter Thür, Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner, expressed concern that there would be great international pressure on states to urge their citizens to forego cash. This, for example, to combat capital flight, terrorism or money laundering. "The trend towards more and more cashless payment transactions will be the next big construction site in data protection," says Thür.
Cashless society is not a utopia
"Should cash one day be abolished, the damage to privacy would be enormous," Thür is convinced. This is problematic because a very precise profile of a person can be created with the analysis of electronic payment transactions, “right down to their sexual inclinations or political views”, according to Thür in the “Tages-Anzeiger”. That cash could be abolished is by no means utopian. Denmark or Sweden are already on the way to a cashless society. In Denmark there are plans that from 2016 petrol stations, restaurants or small shops will no longer have to accept cash.
Andreas Von Gunten, member of the Digital Society and President of the Digital Allmend Association, which advocates public access to digital goods and their further development, also sees dangers in a cashless society. Especially with regard to the abuse of state power. «If there is no more cash, anyone can be excluded from transaction options. For example in the course of investigations and even if someone is innocent, »said Von Gunten to 20 minutes. In this way a person can be broken. As an example, Von Gunten cites the case of Wikileaks, where, under pressure from the American authorities, Paypal credit cards or PostFinance accounts on the disclosure platform were blocked.
Unevenly distributed rights
The problem is that the rights to use this data are unevenly distributed today, says Von Gunten. "Anyone who makes their data available to a company should at least have the right to view, copy and also correct the data collected."
- What is your desk chair
- When did Thomas Edison electrify an elephant?
- Are mollusc shells compostable?
- How can I view my Aerotek Paystub
- What do beauty contests teach our children?
- Isn't it a problem to have a girlfriend
- Who would win Yoshikage or Light?
- Which characteristic leads to the best personality
- Any demons can see the future
- How can I dress modestly?
- Will Tony Stark Award Steve Rogers
- How do I cure a dry penis
- Which is better PSG ITech or Kumaraguru
- Why does Windows 10 install bloatware
- What Kinds of People Buy Paintings
- What are lactones
- What's your rating of Matt Stone
- What tips does a stockbroker give
- Can an electronics engineer become an astronaut?
- What are the best methods for inventory management
- PyCharm Community is enough for newbies
- What is a gaseous fog
- How do trees allow water to seep away?
- What is a pointer in C 1